Purdue creates animation of 9/11 attack

Christoph Hoffmann, a professor of computer science and director of Purdue's Rosen Center for Advanced Computing, a division of Information Technology at Purdue, says the animation reveals more information than could be conveyed through a scientific simulation alone.
news.uns.purdue.edu/x/2007a/070612HoffmannWTC.html

Unduh video

Komentar

  • Thete were no planes that hit the wtc....you only saw a fake illumination. The buildings were wired with explosives for the demolition....proof by the found nanothermite from our U.S. military & building 6 & 7!

    Mamnoo  HubbMamnoo HubbJam Yang lalu
  • Bullshit the flying trailer would never went through the steel around the windows the engine would have fallen to the ground and the fuel would not make it to the other end of the building period

    Dane SwansonDane Swanson2 jam yang lalu
  • ISRAEL & US GOVERNMENT DID 9/11 >>>>>> FACT methodicaldeception (dot) com / the-artists

    Truth ExposedTruth Exposed4 jam yang lalu
  • lügen

    Red engelRed engel16 jam yang lalu
  • This reminds me of that national tragedy

    asdsdjf asdjxajiosdqwasdsdjf asdjxajiosdqw16 jam yang lalu
  • ha ha ha ha...fantasy animation ...aluminum cutting steel.... ha ha ha ha....

    YoungArtClayYoungArtClay21 jam yang lalu
  • *M Fitz* is here to attack any one who questions the official story. These are sock puppet shills that are part of operation earnest voice.

    Dwingles420Dwingles420Hari Yang lalu
  • What a crock, the out side of the building was a self supporting steel shell that would have destroyed the aluminum plane before the massive steel beams would cut it to shreds.

    titus titustitus titusHari Yang lalu
    • The plane was destroyed. This in no way implies the building comes off totally unscathed. Do recall that light could penetrate the Twin Towers so a 115 ton object travelling at 466mph and impacting with the energy of a ton of TNT is no problem i.imgur.com/hJdqzcp.jpg

      M FitzM FitzHari Yang lalu
  • I really don’t think 9/11 was planned

    Jacob SanchezJacob SanchezHari Yang lalu
    • So it was a coincidence?

      Manuel MoralesManuel MoralesHari Yang lalu
  • What’s it mean when they got hijacked

    Graham CrackerGraham CrackerHari Yang lalu
    • Graham Cracker some terrorist steering the wheel

      YingyYango 눈_눈YingyYango 눈_눈Hari Yang lalu
  • year right....... steel vs aluminium. Where are the engines in the model? And where are Newtons 3 law ???

    Steen Hørsløv JensenSteen Hørsløv JensenHari Yang lalu
    • If there is some specific error in the model whose correction would fundamentally change the results then please present your data. Personal incredulity and elementary school comprehension of science doesn't cut it.

      M FitzM FitzHari Yang lalu
  • Bulshit you a bunch of lying motherfukers

    kool breezekool breezeHari Yang lalu
  • This video is !00% lies !!!

    Mark GauvreauMark GauvreauHari Yang lalu
  • There were no planes. Holagrams...The U.S. government did this themselves, to try to justify war, make a shit load of money, and take away peoples civil rights.

    Mark GauvreauMark GauvreauHari Yang lalu
    • No planes no holograms just missiles over lapped by planes executed by the CIA's fake news media. Check out the new Spiderman movie how they use the 9/11 hologram theory. The movie is riddled with 9/11 truth ideology.

      Manuel MoralesManuel MoralesHari Yang lalu
  • Why bother to watch a less than five minute cartoon when you can read thousands of pages of NIST's World Trade Center 'investigative' report to be convinced a jet flying into World Trade Center One or Two can cause structural damage? And if you want to find out what happened after the initiation of global collapse of World Trade Center One or Two you've got less than ten pages of reading to do. No proof of the 'gravity alone' theory in those ten pages ... or anywhere else in NIST's World Trade Center 'investigative' report.

    Blu CrystlBlu CrystlHari Yang lalu
    • @External power - And yet we are all laughing at you instead. Please let me know if you ever decide to become serious. Until then, bugger off.

      M FitzM Fitz5 jam yang lalu
    • @M Fitz Because we like to laugh at you. Lol.

      External powerExternal power8 jam yang lalu
    • @External power - It is stupid. We do not live in a vacuum. There is ALWAYS some resistance. No idea why anyone would ask something like that.

      M FitzM Fitz10 jam yang lalu
    • @M Fitz Because its not a stupid idea. Explain it.

      External powerExternal power11 jam yang lalu
    • @Blu Crystl - All the proof anyone needs is provided by the Mk 1 eyeball. If OTOH you can produce some mechanism by which collapse should have been arrested, thus proving the Twin Towers are in fact still standing, then quit fucking around and bring it. Anything else is a complete waste of yours and everyone else's time.

      M FitzM Fitz11 jam yang lalu
  • Rebuild one of the towers and fly a replica plane into it. Then see what happens? If the billionaires of the world would be willing to do that expensive experiment, this argument would finally be over. If they have enough money to send rockets to Mars and build nuclear weapons, then they have the money for an experiment to settle this issue.

    Susan ZimmerSusan Zimmer2 hari yang lalu
    • Why spend billions recreating something that has been proven? And a little off topic but why would you be upset that we send missions to Mars? Clearly you have no understanding of science and its contributions to the world and society as a whole.

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <---- this is a paid sock puppet shill. Its purpose is to go after anyone who questions the official story.

      Dwingles420Dwingles4202 hari yang lalu
    • Why? It's already been done. Twice.

      M FitzM Fitz2 hari yang lalu
  • Steel vs Aluminum. What a joke this animation is.

    TheTrumpetdogTheTrumpetdog2 hari yang lalu
    • Totally right 👍

      Manuel MoralesManuel MoralesHari Yang lalu
    • @TheTrumpetdog- Analogies are not evidence, especially when they are not even analogies. 115 tons of mass moving at 466 mph has more energy than a ton of high explosives. More than enough to shear some bolts and break some windows. Even light can penetrate the Twin Towers and light has no mass. i.imgur.com/hJdqzcp.jpg

      M FitzM FitzHari Yang lalu
    • @M Fitz ever seen a car vs bike accident with both going 60 mph. Of course the bike cuts right through the car, right?

      TheTrumpetdogTheTrumpetdogHari Yang lalu
    • what does it matter what material was used. If you take 135 tonnes of aluminium or 135 tonnes of feathers and slam it into a building there will be damage. You are probably one of those morons that believe 135 tonnes of feathers is lighter than 135 tonnes of aluminium because one feather is lighter than something like one can however the rest of the educated people understand that 135 tonnes no matter what the material is is still the same weight...and increase speed/ velocity of that weight the more damage you can do.

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
    • Energy, not materials. What a joke your understanding of 9th grade level science is.

      M FitzM Fitz2 hari yang lalu
  • (((Dancing intensifies)))

    Kwangmyongsong 4Kwangmyongsong 43 hari yang lalu
  • BULL SHIT..!!!! The earths flat and this vid is a lie !!!

    Richard JacksonRichard Jackson3 hari yang lalu
  • idiots!! they are saying that a paper airplane can be thrown through a solid wood wall!! even worse an aluminum airplane can slice through core columns!? absolutely not!!

    scottandildiscottandildi3 hari yang lalu
    • nobody has made any claims about paper airplanes or wooden walls....where did you pull that bullshit assertion from?

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <--- this is a paid sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles4203 hari yang lalu
    • Not slice. Slicing was not the failure method. Bolt shearing failure at column end connections. 115 tons moving at 466 mph has more energy than a ton of TNT - more than enough to snap some bolts.

      M FitzM Fitz3 hari yang lalu
  • Aluminum can't cut through STEEL!! an airplane could never take down one of the towers. Two cruise missles hit those buildings. Airplanes were superimposed over them. No one in new York city saw Airplanes it the towers. A cruise missile was video editing hitting pentagon, not an airplane.

    Ajax AshfordAjax Ashford5 hari yang lalu
    • @Dwingles420 nothing but 247365 paid shills. Call em out!

      Manuel MoralesManuel MoralesHari Yang lalu
    • 100% dead on man thank you for your service!

      Manuel MoralesManuel MoralesHari Yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <----- This is a paid sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles4204 hari yang lalu
  • this snows the jet going through the twin towers buit it did not

    EmilyEmily5 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <---- this is a paid sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles4205 hari yang lalu
    • This animation of the Purdue FEA sHows a B767 ENTERING the North Tower, not going THROUGH it. That happened.

      M FitzM Fitz5 hari yang lalu
  • You upload this when i was Born xdd 2007 im 12 😂

    Devil_GachaDevil_Gacha6 hari yang lalu
    • Devil_Gacha You’re young lmao

      unknownunknown6 hari yang lalu
  • Bulshed..

    Bejo KemayangBejo Kemayang6 hari yang lalu
  • So pilots need guns

    Joseph BuhaweJoseph Buhawe7 hari yang lalu
    • Or door locks.

      M FitzM Fitz7 hari yang lalu
  • 911 was an inside job false flag

    Matty GilMatty Gil7 hari yang lalu
  • тупые американцы, самолет не может разрушить такое здание в пыль. Это внутренние бомбы.

    X ManX Man7 hari yang lalu
  • id-vision.net/pass/UChErVQgBuFjXMQF-dOXdRlA Channel: the Search for 9/11 Truth What really happened on September 11th 2001? Is the official narrative accurate? On ID-vision, watch these videos. id-vision.net/pass/UChErVQgBuFjXMQF-dOXdRlA

    Steve O - the Search for 9/11 truthSteve O - the Search for 9/11 truth7 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz is this you? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Voice

      Steve O - the Search for 9/11 truthSteve O - the Search for 9/11 truth6 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz bottom line, a 757 did not hit the Pentagon! That is my only point, the official narrative said that it did happen. I don't care about all of the other details, the fact is a 757 did not crash into that building! Screw all of the official reports, video and photos don't lie! You believe what you want man...

      Steve O - the Search for 9/11 truthSteve O - the Search for 9/11 truth6 hari yang lalu
    • @Steve O - the Search for 9/11 truth - I doubt very much you could figure out the truth if it bit you in the ass. Your pattern of thinking shows the usual failures of the conspiracy-minded. Endless circling of the bowl instead of progressing forward, ignoring critical evidence, quote mining, well poisoning, single elements removed from proper context, etc, etc, etc,... Sorry, not trying to be mean. You are just displaying a clear pattern of behavior and (non)thinking I have seen all too often before.

      M FitzM Fitz6 hari yang lalu
    • @Dwingles420 furthermore, the question is why did they lie? Either we were attacked by terrorists, and our government made it appear to be bigger by lying, or it was all orchestrated and a complete inside job 100%? Either way the facts are very alarming! On top of that, why are none of the other world governments talking about it either? That suggests that they are all complicit with our government. That's the point to all of this, I want to know why? "Why" goes into conspiracy theory...

      Steve O - the Search for 9/11 truthSteve O - the Search for 9/11 truth6 hari yang lalu
  • Weren't the steel beams in between the windows and isnt the plane made of a light aluminum of some sort? Just asking.

    David ScottDavid Scott7 hari yang lalu
    • yes there were steel columns between the windows....windows are made of glass. Inside the towers they were mostly air (open rooms that people walked around in). A plane is not light weight. They were about 135 tons. Glass and air cannot stop an object that weighs 135 tons going 550mph

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
    • Yes, aluminum. 115 tons of aluminum travelling at 466 mph. Would you like to discuss kinetic energy or are we still hung up on materials?

      M FitzM Fitz7 hari yang lalu
  • Bush did 9/11

    Portal MasterPortal Master8 hari yang lalu
    • Really? Explain how

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
  • The conspiracy theorists are so dumb they don't talk about the one plane, Flight 93 crashing in PA, that arguably was shot down rather than crashed (small but finite chance it was shot down seems to me). They are not bright enough to focus on that. I guess they don't teach science in medieval religious schools.

    Ray LopezRay Lopez8 hari yang lalu
    • @Ray Lopez - Clearly not. What you are really saying though is you got caught saying something really stupid and totally unsupportable and instead of owning it you are looking for an out. Typical. Have a nice day.

      M FitzM Fitz6 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz I'm not here to educate you, sorry!

      Ray LopezRay Lopez6 hari yang lalu
    • @Ray Lopez - Bullet holes? Was 93 taken down by the Red Barron?

      M FitzM Fitz7 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz Not zero, even the audiotape of Flight 93 shows bullet hole induced wind noise, the families themselves say so. But very improbable the US govt could keep a secret of that magnitude, I'll concede that.

      Ray LopezRay Lopez7 hari yang lalu
    • Zero evidence for a shoot down. I mean literally zero. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Science always wins.

      M FitzM Fitz7 hari yang lalu
  • peppa pig and george was in one plane mummy pig and daddy pig was in the other so peppa was behind 9/11

    Karah CakesKarah Cakes9 hari yang lalu
  • 9/11 The Game coming soon...

    s8wc3s8wc39 hari yang lalu
  • Never happened

    RipPeterRipPeter10 hari yang lalu
    • so what are you suggesting? The towers are still magically standing today and nobody seems to notice?

      12weasel10012weasel1002 hari yang lalu
  • Nobody: Narrator: “State of the art”

    TheBlashMusicTheBlashMusic10 hari yang lalu
  • Lol

    TTV By the wayTTV By the way10 hari yang lalu
  • R.I.P. I hope we find out who did it. Or we arledy did

    The Noobs Dudes :DThe Noobs Dudes :D10 hari yang lalu
  • Imagine causally typing in your computer and then suddenly a whole Fucking plane just crashes and stops inside the building like 50m from you

    Pilioko YayPilioko Yay10 hari yang lalu
  • It's been 17 years when I saw this accident because I was here when 2 plane crashed and thx to God that me and my father survive in this accident, this is was my biggest fear I was troma in 4 months

    *BIG* *NERF*BIG* *NERF11 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <--- this is a paid sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles42010 hari yang lalu
    • Not an accident.

      M FitzM Fitz10 hari yang lalu
  • Who financed this fake video?

    Rolf EhlersRolf Ehlers11 hari yang lalu
    • @Rolf Ehlers - Will you be completely changing the subject with every post? Is this a habit? If so, I'm not interested.

      M FitzM Fitz9 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz, says who? And WTC 7, definiety a controlled (no plane) demolition!

      Rolf EhlersRolf Ehlers10 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <---- paid sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles42010 hari yang lalu
    • @Rolf Ehlers - That's not true.

      M FitzM Fitz10 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz , excuse me, on the viedeo that was published even the nose of the comparatively soft amuminum "aircraft" that alledgedly had passed the strong steel frame building in full shape popped out on the other side of the building. It is reality that there is this video, but it does not show the actual happenings.

      Rolf EhlersRolf Ehlers10 hari yang lalu
  • 12weasel100 is a sock puppet account. Fake people paid to attack anyone who questions the official story.

    Dwingles420Dwingles42011 hari yang lalu
  • HAHAHAHHAHAH OMEGALUL

    just4fun6783 yeetjust4fun6783 yeet11 hari yang lalu
  • America will never forget that day.

    Adrena OrtizAdrena Ortiz11 hari yang lalu
  • there is no way the wings of any plane could have penatred the steel beams of the tower

    Paul CollettaPaul Colletta11 hari yang lalu
    • Why not?

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • The paid sock puppet shills are quick on this comment.

      Dwingles420Dwingles42011 hari yang lalu
    • But they did so you must be in error. The key is to figure out what you got wrong and why.

      M FitzM Fitz11 hari yang lalu
    • id-vision.net/detail/video-au-vMfRuYMg.html

      Tim SheaTim Shea11 hari yang lalu
  • tyler1 in a nutshell

    Gabriel CGabriel C11 hari yang lalu
  • Who told you that you have to speak English? Who told you that you have to speak at all? Terrible accent, terrible voice.

    Mojgan TavasoliMojgan Tavasoli11 hari yang lalu
    • Racist shithead.

      M FitzM Fitz11 hari yang lalu
  • An airline pilot can instantly send a hijack alert by a number of methods, including a button on the joystick. On 9/11 no hijack alerts were sent. Flight 11, Boston-LA, diverted N shortly after takeoff and, at the edge of a large radar corridor (an area beyond FAA and NORAD mechanical radar coverage), the on-board transponder (which sends flight data such as identity, altitude, and GPS position to air-traffic control) was switched off. Drone AA11 (shadowing drone UAL175) then appeared on radar and, mimicking Flight 11, continued along the same flight path before turning SE. After passing in close proximity to Flight 175, Boston-LA, drone AA11 went on to hit the North Tower of the World Trade Centre at 8:46 (the flash upon impact was the light of a SALH laser designator reflected by the metallic fuselage of the drone airliner as it impacted its "painted" target). Flight 175 (shadowing drone UAL175) continued to manoeuvre SW until, at 8:47, it met Flight 93, Newark-San Francisco (whose takeoff had been delayed by 42 minutes). Just before the closest point of approach Flight 175's transponder was switched off, drone UAL175 then swung around and flew NE to hit the South Tower at 9:03. Flight 93, which had diverted N shortly after takeoff, proceeded W (shadowing Flight 175) and entered a large radar hole near Cleveland. Flight 77, Washington DC-LA, flew 300 W after takeoff passing through a substantial N-S radar corridor over W Virginia. The plane then turned, its transponder was switched off, and it re-entered radar darkness heading E. Drone AA77 then appeared on radar and, mimicking Flight 77, continued on to DC, looped and hit the newly renovated, reinforced west wedge of the Pentagon at 9:37 killing a number of accountants and destroying their paperwork. All CCTV footage of the plane crash (and the telltale flash upon impact) was then seized by the FBI and has never been released. After passing the radar hole near Cleveland the first spurious Flight 93 cellphone call (from 35,000 ft) was received, "Our plane has been hijacked ... call the authorities" (9:27), air-traffic control were informed, "We have a bomb on board" (9:32), the jetliner turned, a flight attendant contacted UA by Airfone and alerted them to the hijacking (9:36), air-traffic control were warned once again "We have a bomb aboard" (9:39), the transponder was then switched off and the kamikaze rogue re-entered radar darkness heading for Washington DC. (Incredibly, Air Force command claim that they first heard about Flight 93 at 10:07 - after the "crash".) "An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.... Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft will meanwhile continue to fly the filed flight plan." Department of Defence, Operation Northwoods, March 1962 Drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and submitted to Defence Secretary Robert McNamara on 13 March 1962, the DOD's Operation Northwoods proposal - for US secret-state forces to covertly attack American civilian and military targets and then falsely implicate Cuba as a pretext for war - was rejected by President John F Kennedy. Among the possible scenarios outlined in "brief but precise" detail was a fiendish plane-swap deception whereby a "chartered civil airliner" would be replaced with an exact duplicate. "Selected passengers" using "carefully prepared aliases" would board the fake at a regular airport and the plane would take off as normal. The original registered aircraft - belonging to a CIA front company - would be converted into a remote-controlled drone at a secret-state facility. At a pre-planned position the two would rendezvous, the passenger-carrying duplicate would then descend below radar and head to an "auxiliary field" at a nearby Air Force base. The original airliner, under remote control, would continue along the duplicate's flight path until, at a suitable location, it would be blown out of the sky by "Cuban MIGs" (i.e. on-board explosives remotely detonated). Retrieved in 1997 under Freedom of Information laws by a federal agency dealing with documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy, the Defence Department's top secret Northwoods proposal - "suitable for planning purposes" - also recommended planting aircraft debris and phoney evidence at crash sites and called for the development of a "Communist Cuban terror campaign" within US cities to be blamed on Cuban agents and refugees. "three males appearing to be Iranian ... dark-skinned with red bandanas on their heads ... two in the cockpit and a third had a red belt with a box that constituted some kind of a bomb." A Flight 93 call from passenger Jeremy Glick During a 2004 Christmas Eve address to US occupation forces in Baghdad Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld unwittingly confessed: "the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania." The one eyewitness to 93's ostensible "crash" was Lee Purbaugh, a scrap-metal worker hired only the day before: "I saw it rock from side to side then, suddenly, it dipped and dived, nose first, with a huge explosion, into the ground." According to the 9/11 Commission Report - based on flight data supplied by the Pentagon and FBI - Flight 93 rolled over at 580 mph and then "crashed" upside down. Three "loud bangs" were heard and 12 witnesses reported seeing an unmarked white jet circling overhead. A C-130 cargo plane was also seen and is officially acknowledged to have been in the area. Seven boxes of "surprisingly intact mementos of lives lost" were recovered from the Shanksville crater site (situated a few miles west of the main Libertsville-Indian Lake debris field) and were returned to bereaved relatives (a hijacker's Lebanese passport and Cripps-style red bandana were also retrieved). Leading seismologist and head of the Southern Arizona Seismic Observatory Terry Wallace, using consolidated data from four seismic survey stations in the area, fixed the origin time of the Shanksville 9/11 shockwave to 10:06:05 +/- 2 seconds. According to the official story, however, the plane "crashed" at 10:03. "Up, down. Up, down. What? Up, down. Ahh. Ahh. Unintelligible. Ahh. Shut them off. Shut them off. Go. Go. Move. Move. Turn it up. Down, down. Pull it down. Pull it down. Down. Push, push, push, push, push. Hey. Hey. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me. Unintelligible. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. No. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest." Flight 93 cockpit voice recording (CVR) transcript, 10:01:41-10:03:09 They hit the Pentagon in Washington DC, "attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania" and then, on 8 November 2001, an illegitimate president addressed the nation and said: "We will no doubt face new challenges, but we have our marching orders. My fellow Americans, Let's Roll." "a number of regimes remain deeply hostile to America - North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria ... a new Pearl Harbor ... remove these regimes from power and conduct post-combat stability operations.... multiple, simultaneous theatre wars ... service budgets must return to the [Cold War] level of approximately $90 to $95 billion ... further NATO expansion ... Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as Iraq has.... a new family of nuclear weapons ... Raising U.S. military strength in East Asia is the key to coping with the rise of China to great-power status.... advanced forms of biological warfare ... budget levels to be increased to 3.5 to 3.8 percent of GDP.... a system of global missile defences ... a galaxy of surveillance satellites ... Control of space and cyberspace.... If defense budgets remain at projected levels, America's global military preminence will be impossible to maintain, as will the world order that is secured by that pre-eminence." The Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America's Defences, September 2000

    Waleed HigginsWaleed Higgins12 hari yang lalu
    • Look at all the sock puppet shills here.....

      Dwingles420Dwingles42011 hari yang lalu
    • I think you are commenting on the wrong video. This has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Flight 77.

      M FitzM Fitz11 hari yang lalu
    • Smoke another one...

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • you are an idiot.

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
  • us atack us....

    ayub ahmadsuhaimiayub ahmadsuhaimi12 hari yang lalu
  • There is no way that the wings of an airplane could cut through the giant beams on the outside wall.

    CarskinifyCarskinify12 hari yang lalu
    • "There is no way that the wings of an airplane could cut through the giant beams on the outside wall." -Said no physicist _ever..._ The outside columns were constructed with steel that was no thicker than a half inch. It wasn't just the aluminum of the wing that caused the columns to break, you also have to consider the wings were very massive, as the were nearly full of jet fuel. That amount of mass moving at such a high velocity can certainly sever steel columns.

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • "There is no way that the wings of an airplane could cut through the giant beams on the outside wall." -Said no physicist _ever..._ The outside columns were constructed with steel that was no thicker than a half inch. It wasn't just the aluminum of the wing that caused the columns to break, you also have to consider the wings were very massive, as the were nearly full of jet fuel. That amount of mass moving at such a high velocity can certainly sever steel columns.

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • who says a plane that weighs nearly 135 tonnes going 550mph couldn't slam through the columns? What are you suggesting should have happened? The towers are mostly glass and air are you suggesting glass and air should have stopped a 135 tonne object going 550mph? Are you suggesting the plane should have just bounced off the towers like a rubber ball? What is your theory?

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • They didn't and no one is claiming they did. Wrong mechanism. I must say though that personal incredulity is not an argument.

      M FitzM Fitz12 hari yang lalu
  • Death to america!

    00000000000012 hari yang lalu
  • Total yahooud for yahooudi film 👎👎😃😂🇮🇱🇺🇸you film Total

    Big BiigBig Biig13 hari yang lalu
    • what do you think is wrong with it? What do you think should have happened?

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
  • It was a setup there was someone the put bombs on the bottom of the building it fell straight down if it was to fall it would have tilted over

    DevGamingDevGaming13 hari yang lalu
    • @DevGaming "probably" If you at any time thought you had an argument to present it ended there with that one word. I hope you realize why.

      Tim SheaTim Shea12 hari yang lalu
    • @DevGaming - This Purdue FEA and subsequent animation that are the subject of this video do not concern themselves with the collapse or collapse mechanisms. Not their mandate. Collapse initiation however did occur at the impact floors and worked its way down from there. Collapse initiation did not occur at the base. The collapse mechanisms are largely visible to the naked eye (if you know what to look for and want to see) and well understood. Sagging floor trusses in the impact and fire zone caused inward bowing of increasingly overloaded and gradually weakening perimeter columns by up to 5 feet until they buckled. Once those perimeter columns buckled thousands of tons of falling debris worked its way down the open office space, instantly shearing the bolted floor truss connections as the debris hit the next intact floor. Rinse and repeat x90. There is no mechanism by which either tower could have or would have "tilted over". They were not trees and not anything like so rigid. If you think that assessment is wrong then please show your math.

      M FitzM Fitz12 hari yang lalu
    • You know

      DevGamingDevGaming12 hari yang lalu
    • Tim Shea because the government hid it from the public and who ever knew bombs where use the government probably told them to say nothing or threaten them the government is sneaky

      DevGamingDevGaming12 hari yang lalu
    • @DevGaming Please read what M Fitz wrote. The collapses started at the point where the planes hit; near the top of the building. Not the bottom. The top. It was a top down progressive collapse. There is zero evidence bombs where used.

      Tim SheaTim Shea12 hari yang lalu
  • Goes against physics

    Sentry service ServiceSentry service Service13 hari yang lalu
    • @12weasel100 - Funnier how they don't seem to realize that by claiming the laws of physics were violated they are invoking magic and/or the supernatural.

      M FitzM Fitz11 hari yang lalu
    • Funny how you idiot truthers all claim it goes against physics but none of you seem capable of actually explaining your physics

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • Dwingles420 doesn't know which physics either.

      M FitzM Fitz12 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <---- This guy is a paid shill who camps on 9/11 videos and goes after anyone who questions it.

      Dwingles420Dwingles42013 hari yang lalu
    • How so? Please explain in as much detail as you can.

      M FitzM Fitz13 hari yang lalu
  • Yes because razor thin aluminium wings can sheer through layers of solid steel 😂😂😂

    Richard StoneRichard Stone13 hari yang lalu
    • @Alchemist - I am curious where it gets the idea that B767 wings are "razor thin" or that solid steel has layers. Nothing about the OP makes a lick of sense.

      M FitzM Fitz12 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz <---- sock puppet shill.

      Dwingles420Dwingles42013 hari yang lalu
    • @Alchemist well said

      ItsCheeseCrackerzItsCheeseCrackerz13 hari yang lalu
    • It's "shear" and you obviously don't understand momentum and mass co-efficiencies. Now piss off.

      AlchemistAlchemist13 hari yang lalu
    • No one is claiming that happened.

      M FitzM Fitz13 hari yang lalu
  • M Fitz is a paid sock puppet shill. SOrt comments by new and check the replies. Look up operation earnest voice.

    Dwingles420Dwingles42014 hari yang lalu
    • @Dwingles420 But if I'm you, does that make you the sock puppet? It's so hard keeping all the delusions straight!

      Tim SheaTim Shea12 hari yang lalu
    • @Tim Shea Aww! Trying to proctect a fellow sock puppet!

      Dwingles420Dwingles42013 hari yang lalu
    • *Sort comments by new and check the replies* Hey. That's what I do! Maybe I'm you, Dwingles! I'll check.....

      Tim SheaTim Shea14 hari yang lalu
  • Scientific simulation? Ooh I see... just like flat earth!! Ok, I believin you.

    deny ariyantodeny ariyanto14 hari yang lalu
    • "Scientific simulation? Ooh I see... just like flat earth!! Ok, I believin you." -You are comparing the idea that 9/11 _wasn't_ a conspiracy to the Flat Earth??? You're an idiot....

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • "Scientific simulation? Ooh I see... just like flat earth!! Ok, I believin you." -You are comparing the idea that 9/11 _wasn't_ a conspiracy to the Flat Earth??? You're an idiot....

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • @M Fitz thank's bro

      deny ariyantodeny ariyanto14 hari yang lalu
    • @deny ariyanto You can always read through the FEA if you have any concerns about inputs. All the data is there.

      M FitzM Fitz14 hari yang lalu
    • @deny ariyanto The simulation came AFTER the real world event dumbass. Do all you people forget this was a real thing that happened? The mind boggles!

      M FitzM Fitz14 hari yang lalu
  • “This is not reality, this is fantasy” ....

    jerry pachecojerry pacheco14 hari yang lalu
    • Except in reality it happened.

      M FitzM Fitz14 hari yang lalu
  • Just came for the comments.

    Magister LudiMagister Ludi14 hari yang lalu
    • Stay for the Veal.

      M FitzM Fitz13 hari yang lalu
  • Brendon O Connell on You Tube, the 'TALPIOT PROGRAMME' how Bolshevik Israel has infiltrated the USA as DUAL CITIZENS' who's allegiance is to the iold Soviet Union and are transferring weapons and computer technology to Israel 'and then sold or given to Russia and China id-vision.net/detail/video-babgv2qRf4k.html Israel will soon be the number 1 Cyber power in the world!

    TEATEA15 hari yang lalu
  • Looks like shreks roar reached new york

    King slavic Vault boyKing slavic Vault boy15 hari yang lalu
  • That bullshit!! Most of the airplane is fiberglass!? A couple of 454 engines took the building down??? stupid government not very smart!?

    Ely CashEly Cash15 hari yang lalu
    • a plane is not fiberglass. And no plane (or engines) took down any building. The planes merely caused damage and started the fires. It was the resulting fires that started the collapses. You should really learn what happened before you open that stink hole of a mouth and make yourself look like a complete jack ass.

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • @Ely Cash You agree your claims are bullshit?

      Tim SheaTim Shea13 hari yang lalu
    • @Tim Shea No is Right!!

      Ely CashEly Cash13 hari yang lalu
    • *Most of the airplane is fiberglass!?* No. *A couple of 454 engines took the building down???* No.

      Tim SheaTim Shea14 hari yang lalu
  • www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1441270/Magnificent-19-praised-by-Muslim-extremists.html

    Anthony HalifaxAnthony Halifax16 hari yang lalu
    • @12weasel100 Premptive against the conspiracy theorists!

      Anthony HalifaxAnthony Halifax11 hari yang lalu
    • what is the point of your link?

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • Was this supposed to mean something?

      Tim SheaTim Shea14 hari yang lalu
  • a tree can cut the wings from a 747, and here this wings cut high quality steel column?? yes, very plausible,stop to lie to the people!!! Tower collapse,Fema arrives one day befor in NY, 1 week befor the elect.was shut down for 3 days, speculation at the wall street,no millitary jets interceptet the planes,etc,etc,etc

    leonardimas1leonardimas116 hari yang lalu
    • +leonardumbass1 " here this wings cut high quality steel column?? yes? -Yes, correct. "stop to lie to the people!!!" -Your dumb ass wouldn't know a lie, if one sat on your face! "Fema arrives one day befor in NY, 1 week befor the elect" -Huh??? "sir you don't have to be a scientist to see what was really happening that day" -Right, it's clear 19 Muslim hijackers flew planes into buildings. "and then we invaded Iraq and they didn't have anything to do with it" -Correct. "and how many American lives were lost over there for What?" -Off topic.

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
    • +leonardumbass1 " here this wings cut high quality steel column?? yes? -Yes, correct. "stop to lie to the people!!!" -Your dumb ass wouldn't know a lie, if one sat on your face! "Fema arrives one day befor in NY, 1 week befor the elect" -Huh??? "sir you don't have to be a scientist to see what was really happening that day" -Right, it's clear 19 Muslim hijackers flew planes into buildings. "and then we invaded Iraq and they didn't have anything to do with it" -Correct. "and how many American lives were lost over there for What?" -Off topic.

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg11 hari yang lalu
  • So sad ... rip

    Jordan JohnJordan John17 hari yang lalu
  • RIP to all who lost their lives that day and also those who died at a later time due to injuries inflicted in the 9/11 attack. Peace and comfort to all who lost a loved one on that day.

    cmmahoney21cmmahoney2117 hari yang lalu
  • Completly animated BULLSHIT!

    Mainz FreeTVMainz FreeTV17 hari yang lalu
    • what is bullshit? Please enlighten us and be specific instead of just spewing out a one liner idiot comment. And please explain what you think really happened? Explain how millions of experts all got it wrong and why you think you are smarter than them all

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • Because your dumb ass says so?

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg17 hari yang lalu
  • I know now that some truths can never be undone rip 9/11

    kenneth klementkenneth klement18 hari yang lalu
  • Tom Brokaw said '' One of the Hijackers Passports was found a Block Away If You Can Believe That '' I sure don't but their are a few here that do. Sink hole real estate anyone ?

    SnickersbiteSnickersbite18 hari yang lalu
    • Lots of material was thrown clear of the towers. Why do you ignore it all and focus only on a passport? Lots of material including passports are thrown clear or survive almost all plane crashes so why do you think it was odd on 911? Why are you even babbling about a passport? What are you trying to prove? How does a passport prove WTC was a demo?

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
  • Whoever fights Monsters ?

    Yat Ying HaYat Ying Ha18 hari yang lalu
  • Jay Leno Hit's the street to ask some basic question's that show's us how dumb down America has become . quite obvious here. It's more about the argument then the facts and the use of common sense and know when something is wrong and your being lied too.

    SnickersbiteSnickersbite18 hari yang lalu
    • who is lying to us? What are the lying about?

      12weasel10012weasel10011 hari yang lalu
    • @asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg um okay?

      SnickersbiteSnickersbite17 hari yang lalu
    • "your being lied too." -_You're_ being lied to, Dumbass!

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg18 hari yang lalu
    • "your being lied too." -_You're_ being lied to, Dumbass!

      asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdgasrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg18 hari yang lalu
Purdue creates animation of 9/11 attack